Graphs about thebrain3/15/2023 Team No-Urgency, as opposed to the hundreds of individual climate constituencies in play today (all playing Solitaire). I think there can be real value to the idea of reducing the challenge to Team Urgency vs. Definitely not your conventional chessboard, I just happen to like this image more than 3D chessboard images I've found (there aren't many). □ I've played with various metaphors, including the Million Piece Jigsaw Puzzle below. Is this making sense or should I create a video? If I'm in the symptoms list, and I go to (symptom, pain, sharp) and I create the child (sprain, symptom, pain, sharp) that should automatically link under (sprain, symptoms) and even better, if the (symptom, pain, sharp) doesn't exist in the global list, it is automatically created there and then linked. Then when i list the symptom under (sprain, symptoms, pain, sharp) there could be a rule to link all condition specific symptoms to the global list of symptoms. What should happen is the in some sort of "master" section, I should be able to say "all conditions have symptoms" so when I make a condition (condition, sprain) it automatically makes a child thought (sprain, symptoms). I've streamlined the process but it's still a pain to hand map everything. And when each condition has many symptoms, and symptoms are not unique among conditions, it takes a while. = Condition, Hyperkyphosis, Symptom, Posture, Hip, Excess Flexionīut when I make the child I have to make it under one of the thoughts, I have to manually link it to the other. What I end up doing is making a child thought with two parentsĬondition, Hyperkyphosis, Symptoms + Symptom, Posture, Hip, Excess Flexion I need specific notes for each condition with regards to the symptom, so I can't write notes specific to the condition in the symptom itself (ie hyperlordosis hip flexion may have different notes than scoliosis hip flexion) Symptom, Posture, Shoulder, Rolled Forward Symptom, ROM (Range of Motion), Restricted So i have a few thought types for these, and there are many more items in each list, but to give you an idea of my frustration. So my dilemma - I'm a massage therapist working on a database of ailments, symptoms, treatments, techniques, tests (etc) as well as a map of muscles, their attachment locations to bony prominence, which are sections of bone. So, within the next 4 months I want to do a presentation for the brain for the team on implementing some solution for the "map everything by hand" that can be cumbersome for repetitive thoughts with many to many connections. Tools: The Brain | Evernote | Omnigraffle | OmniOutliner | Scrivener | Knowledge extraction/classification and semantic language tools would provide such capabilities. The only way to keep at par with developments in a knowledge-exploding environment. I suggest considering using software that semantically relates content in dynamically related views, TB helping us to map and do part of the work for us. We run into the limitations of mapping things one by one by hand. And since jumpt-thought like connections explode, volume-wise, as the number of Thoughts in a Brain increase, it becomes more and more cumbersome to keep the mapping complete and efficient. In other words: variety of Thoughts increases, Thoughts get sementically linked, and this makes my Brain having related info covered in different thoughts that are inreasingly difficult to map and keep relation (as jump thoughts). I sometimes find that TB does not let me get ahead of the curve in professional knowledge development, since the user needs to map by hand content that has a continuously proliferating variety, and since my knowledge classification criteria shift over time: new keywords, similar words for the same topic, changing interests that may sometimes become persistent or sometimes head back to the original topics. I have been using TB as of 2005 and since then considerably increased my collection of knowledge. PersonalBrain 4.3 Experimental Release Archive TheBrain for iOS 1.0 Beta - Password required
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |